Epstein Secrets

ime-relevant factors. Finally, the interview terminates with the pro forma, Is there anything else?—which invariably yields no new information (see Fisher, Geiselman, & Raymond, 1987, for a description of American police, and George & Clifford, 1992, for a similar description of British police). What

Two other studies have examined the CI with victims and witnesses of real-world crimes. In these field studies, one conducted in the United States (Fisher, Geiselman, & Amador 1989) and one EFTA01657053 conducted in England (George & Clifford, 1992), experienced police officers received training in

nitive Interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Ronald P. Fisher R. Edward Geiselman Florida International University University of California, Los Angeles Abstract Police officers receive little or no training to conduct intervie

iselman, Fishes Cohen, et al., 1986). We then refined the technique on the basis of insights gained from analyzing tape-recorded field interviews2 (Fisher, Geiselman, & Raymond, 1987). In the revised version, which was evaluated in the present study. we approached the eyewitness's problem from the fo

call in a court of law. In response to the need to improve police interview tech- niques and to avoid the legal problems of hypnosis, Geiselman and Fisher (Geiselman, Fisher, Cohen, Holland, & Suites, 1986; Geiselman, Fisher, Firstenberg, Hutton, Sullivan, Avetissian, & Prosk, 1984; Geiselman, Fisher,

I-gale tiro OTATIOXS 253 3 authors, including: Ronald Fisher Florida International University 130 PUBICA110XS 6.9119 CITATIONS READS 5,697 r R. Edward Geiselman cop University of California, Los Angeles T9 PUS.10.11ONS 3.644 C rte. OWS SEE PROFILE SEE MERE Some of the authors of this publication are als

liars: the benefit of ask- ing unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior 2009; 33:159.166 18. Vrij A, Leal S, Mann S, Warmelink L, Granhag P, Fisher R: Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detec- tion tool. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2010; 24:587.594 19. Colwell K, Hiscock-Anisman CK, M

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY, VOLUME 30, ISSUE 3, 2012/1 THE COGNITIVE INTERVIEW FOR SUSPECTS (CIS) R. Edward Geiselman. Ph.D. The investigative interview protocol known as the cognitive interview (CI) was modified for use with suspects to maximize the opportunity t