Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cipation of either in the instant litigation. ' The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ticipation of either in the instant litigation. The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
5 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (1 at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cipation of either in the instant litigation. ° The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. (a. at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
cipation of either in the instant litigation. ' The Government asserts that the work-product doctrine applies to documents prepared by attorneys in the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) in response to Petitioners' counsel's request for an investigation into the Government's handling of the Epstein case. (DE 216-1 at 12-14). A
65 at 13). Second, they argue that the doctrine does not apply because the conduct of those prosecutors is a "central issue" in this case. a at 15). The Courts finds these arguments unavailing. First, Petitioners argue that the "work product doctrine does not apply to claims advanced by crime victims that
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (61)
Entities connected to both the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility and The Courts
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON24 w/ the·4 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION23 w/ the·4 w/ The
United States
LOCATION22 w/ the·4 w/ The
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION21 w/ the·3 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION15 w/ the·4 w/ The
The Eighth Circuit
ORGANIZATION15 w/ the·4 w/ The
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON15 w/ the·4 w/ The
Main Justice
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·4 w/ The
Kenneth Marra
PERSON5 w/ the·4 w/ The
Table
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
ST
Subpoena Duces Tecum
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ The
HI
Hickman
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ The
Intervenor Epstein's Motion for the Court to Protect From Disclosure Grand
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
State Farm Ins
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
Atlanta Gas Light Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
Douglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
Kent Corp.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
United States Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
the Federal Rules of Civil
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The
D.C. Cir
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ The