Epstein Secrets

r's strategy is given by a pair (a, a The first component I. Alexander R (1987) The &obey of Moral sntems (Aldine de Cayter, New Toth). 2. Rand DG, Nowak MA (2012) Human cooperation. Trends Cogn Ski 117:413-425. 3. Malls AP, Semmann D (2010) How Is human cooperation different? PAWS Trans A Soc 8 365:266

olution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 937:1291- 1298. 15. Nowak MA (2006) Five rule. har the evolution of cooperation. Science 319:1560-1563. 16. Sigmund K (2010) The Calculus of Selfishness (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton). 17. Sigmund K (2012) Moral assessment in indirect reciprocity./ Thew Bid 29925

me.Thcatetk Analph (springer. Berleil. 10. Now* IAN Sigmund K (199() Evolution of incited reogrotity be image scoring Nita 393(6685):573-577. 11. Nowak MA. Sigmund K (20051 Evolution of inbred retipraily. Neese 43717063): 1291-12% 12. Nowak MA 0006) Pa nies for the evolution of cooperation. Science 31

y finite automata. I Icon Theory 57:278-305. 7. Him* MA. Sigmund K 11992) Ti for let in heterogeneous Populatioiwalarive 355: 250-253. & Hawk PA, Sigmund K (1993) A strategy of win.stay, lose4rft that outperforms lit. for.tat In the Prisoners Dilemma game NOW. 361(64321:56-58. evolve to be in love toda

, 2009a. Strategy abundance in 2x2 games for arbitrary mutation rates. J. Theor. Biol. 257, 340-344. [4] Antal T, Ohtsuki H, Wakeley .J, Taylor PD, Nowak MA, 2009b. Evolutionary game dynamics in phenotype space. PNAS, to appear. [5] Antal, T. and Scheming, I., 2006. Fixation of strategies for an evoluti

s, Cambridge, UK. [54] Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K., 1990. Adaptive dynamics and evolutionary stability. Appl. Math. Lett. 3, 75-79. [55] Hofbauer J, Sigmund K, 1998. Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics, Cam- bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK. [56] Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K., 2003. Evolutionary game d