Epstein Secrets

o whom it was made; (4) the intention that it should be acted upon; and (5) that the plaintiff acted upon it to his damage. COUNSEL: ri] ATTORNEYS: Maria Tankenson Hodge, Esq., Hodge & Francois, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I., For the plaintiffs. Gregory H. Hodges, Esq., Dudley, Topper and Feuerzeig, LLP, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I

volved in the deal. (Compl. P 14.) In August 2001, in an effort to dissuade Epstein from seeking to remove AIG as the manager of the AIG Investment, John Purcell, a Citibank representative, told Jeffrey Schantz, a lawyer for Epstein, that Citibank was acting in Epstein's interests and that Epstein should tru

ically implausible antitrust claims must come forward with more persuasive evidence to support them EFTA00187401 Page I of 2 VVestiaw. Page 1 Maria Tankenson Hodge Current Firm Information Unknown hodgfranOislands.vi Position: Member Education: University of California at Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law,

lved in the deal. (Comp1.1 14.) In August 2001, in an effort to dissuade Epstein from seeking to remove AIG as the manager of the AIG Investment, John Purcell, a Citibank representative, told Jeffrey Schantz, a lawyer for Ep- stein, that Citibank was acting in Ep- stein's interests and that Epstein should

) ) Plaintiffs, v. ) ) ) Civ. No. 2002-108 ) CITIBANK, N.A. AND CITIGROUP, d/b/a "CITIGROUP," INC. ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ATTORNEYS: Maria Tankenson Hodge, Esq. Hodge & Francois St. Thomas, U.S.V.I., For the plaintiffs, Gregory H. Hodges, Esq. Dudley, Topper and Feuerzeig, LLP St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.

00723 EFTA00228103 Financial Trust Co. v. Citibank Civil No. 02-108 Memorandum Opinion Page 5 remove AIG as the manager of the AIG Investment, John Purcell, a Citibank representative, told Jeffrey Schantz, a lawyer for Epstein, that Citibank was acting in Epstein's interests and that Epstein should tr