Epstein Secrets

hed. Their qualifications statement will also be in the Appendix of the revised EAR. Letter: The removal of the dock which was not permitted by the USACE is now descripted in the EAR section 5.00. These areas are highlighted for ease of review in the revised EAR. The following has been added to the l

vious owner submitted an application for the existing dock which was approved by DPNR's Division of Coastal Zone Management, but was not approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers due to objections by National Marine Fisheries because of the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner despite not re

can approach and land on the end of the dock while vessels can dock along the "L.". The existing dock in Shallow Bay which is not permitted by the USACE in its current configuration will be removed upon completion of a usable new dock. It is understood that your approval of the renewal must be first

ed an application for the existing dock which was approved by DPNR's Division of Coastal 2 EFTA00802625 Zone Management, but was not approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers due to objections by National Marine Fisheries because of the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner despite not re

the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner despite not receiving the federal permit and notices were issued by the USACE requesting the removal of the unpermitted structure. The dock however was never removed. The applicant understands the issues with the existing doc

ted an application for the existing dock which was approved by DPNR's Division of Coastal 2 EFTA00802727 Zone Management but was not approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers due to objections by National Marine Fisheries because of the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner despite not re