3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
From: Erika Kellerhals < Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:35 AM To: John P. Woods, AIA Cc: Jeffrey E.; Cecile de Jongh Subject: Re: Thanks John our 45 =ay window to appeal to the BLUA expires on November 5, 2016 — so if y=u ca
t the height appears to refer to attachments =n a building than a freestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner can preva=l with that. If not, go to Land Use & Appeals. JPW From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sen=: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:13 PM To: Erika Kellerhals; Ce=ile de Jongh; John P. Wood
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:20 PM To: John P. Woods Subject: Re: the gov and I have spoken about dpnr, 40 i told him that i was at my wits end , being given rules , =hat jp makes up, ie not being
the height appears to refer to attachments on a building than a =reestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner can prevail with that. If not= go to Land Use & Appeals. JPW From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.=om <mailto:jeevacation@gmailcom> I Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:13 PM To: =rika Kellerhals
From: John P. Woods, AIA Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 8:36 PM To: Erika Kellerhals Cc: jeffrey E.; Cecile de Jongh; John P. Woods Subject: Re: I would still
the height appears to refer to at=achments on a building than a freestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner=can prevail with that. If not, go to Land Use & Appeals. JPW From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> I Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:13 PMTo: Erika Kellerhals;
Entities connected to both John P. Woods and Land Use & Appeals