t the height appears to refer to attachments =n a building than a freestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner can preva=l with that. If not, go to Land Use & Appeals. JPW From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sen=: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:13 PM To: Erika Kellerhals; Ce=ile de Jongh; John P. Wood

the height appears to refer to attachments on a building than a =reestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner can prevail with that. If not= go to Land Use & Appeals. JPW From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail.=om <mailto:jeevacation@gmailcom> I Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:13 PM To: =rika Kellerhals

the height appears to refer to at=achments on a building than a freestanding pole. Hopefully the Commissioner=can prevail with that. If not, go to Land Use & Appeals. JPW From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> I Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 1:13 PMTo: Erika Kellerhals;