Epstein Secrets

dwards, 4'h DCA Case No. 4D18-0787. (Composite Exhibit C.) CONCLUSION Epstein's general references in pre-trial filings with this Court and in the Fourth District Court of Appeal to the 47 exhibits in question are fully compliant with the Court's rulings at the March 8, 2018 hearing. Epstein has not dissemina

has been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on June 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [fax] By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN

t for record, the case I keep on my bunch is Palm Beach Polo holdings, Inc., et. al versus Broward Marino, Inc. I have the original email from the Fourth District Court of Appeal copy. So I don't have a cite for you, but it's from 2015. That's easily accessible if you'd like to road it. MR. LINK: Thank you.

t was your position, which la why there is a frustration hare. Continuances aro discretionary under the law. I have wide discretion. The Rule of Judicial Administration of this state -- and I do my boat to follow [ham. And you have probably heard me at 8 :4Ss make this statoment, at least if not expressly, implled

e all r. 90.702, work-product pr inethical behavior, is; onse in Opposition to Pr eider from the Fourth Di P. Cassell's Pro Hac Vi. ) the Fourth District Cc Ida+ for panel purposes 03/17/18 TLC Cr c, ionology of Ix i, .; review court filings, tr; r re same 03/17/18 SJL C( ) I Edwards' Resp

include trial court's multip' .rences to J. Epstein's original proceeding as bei :nesis" for B. Edwards' counterclaim 03/10/18 RJG Revir. s of Judicial Administration re sealing of rector( Jpellate court 03/10/18 RJG Reviev. yze correspondence from non-party intervel. ounsel re failure to caption them In fil

, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180886 44 I 1 before, your Honor. 2 Your Honor, we do intend to take 3 certiorari on this to the Fourth District 4 Court. 5 THE COURT: That's why I figure 6 between the written rule and the disclosure 7 give you a chance to catch your breath and 8 do t

ontained if it were not dealing with a 16 grand jury proceeding, obviously there's a 17 test that the Court must then use under the 18 Rules of Judicial Administration and it 19 says matters can be sealed but they should 20 be sealed if there's a compelling 21 government interest or if the sealing is 22 impo