Epstein Secrets

Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sling 55 EFTA00224189 COURTIIIIIIIIIIIII .11-Mr . FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION , a CHARGE11.„ U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 l'a Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

d and had sex with them. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. 2422(b); 2423(b); 2252(aX1) & (a)(4) Consummated In The Matter of The Herald Company, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11930 (N.D.N.Y. 2006); underlying case U.S. I Gawk, Case No. 5- 05-MJ-341 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Telephone Mayor solicited 14

months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica

ohnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) No information available. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. In The Matter of The Herald Company, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11930 (N.D.N.Y. 2006) . No Information No information available. Mayor charged with 2422(b) ; regarding unsealing of af

nsummated Showed up for meeting Stint, Sentenced to 78 months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 1th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

ohnson, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) No information available. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. In The Matter of The Herald Company, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11930 (N.D.N.Y. 2006) No Information — No information available. Mayor charged with 2422(b) ; regarding unsealing of a

5,000 fine, $86 restitution & $300 special assessment. Affirmed. 57 EFTA00226339 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION. CIIARGE.S U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica

ld and had sex with them. Affirmed at 446 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2006) supra. 2422(b); 2423(b); 2252(aX1) & (a)(4) Consummated In The Matter of The Herald Company, Inc., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11930 (N.D.N.Y. 2006); underlying case U.S. Gosek, Case No. 5- 05-MJ-341 (N.D.N.Y. I 2005) Telephone Mayor solicited