Epstein Secrets

Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sling 55 EFTA00224189 COURTIIIIIIIIIIIII .11-Mr . FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION , a CHARGE11.„ U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 l'a Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

9 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); US. . Bianchi, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90073 (E.D. Pa. 2006) (2423(e) conspiracy). .......... COURT CASES ikcnIrM FACTS/COMMUNICATION CIXRGEAlli 1" Cir. U.S. I Dewire, 271 F.3d 333 (1" Cir. Internet

months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica

(D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); U.S. v. Bianchi, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90073 (E.D. Pa. 2006) (2423(e) conspiracy). z40, . eus" -' - L CASESt• • " z Y-" FACILI ,FACTS/COMMIJNICATION . , , • . _ CHARGE I d Cir. U.S. v. Dewire,

nsummated Showed up for meeting Stint, Sentenced to 78 months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 1th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

(D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); U.S. v. Bianchi, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90073 (E.D. Pa. 2006) (2423(e) conspiracy). br( ‘ . FACILITY • FAciagautgaugiN CHARGE 1" Cir. U.S. v. Dewire, 271 F.3d 333 (1" Cir. Internet AOL instant messa

5,000 fine, $86 restitution & $300 special assessment. Affirmed. 57 EFTA00226339 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION. CIIARGE.S U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica

r downward sentence departure based on diminished capacity denied. 2422(b); 2252 Not Consummated *U.S.I Bianchi, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90073 (E.D. Pa. 2006) * Conspiracy Foreign travel Defendant conspired to travel to Cuba, Moldova, and Romania to have sex with minors. Foreign travel; wiretapped p