Epstein Secrets

d no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet No information available. Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 2422(b) Sting 38874 (W.D. Mo

information available. Conviction affirmed. 2422(b) No Information 40 EFTA00224174 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. I Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557 (9th Cir. 2004) Internet AOL IM chats with 14 yr-old girl; sexually explicit conversations; defendant persisted in trying to arra

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated • • Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA01729548 egIllit 1 CASES, --- Fs ILI - -- ' enc: , , • . -CR

856 (9'h Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet . Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6) No Information U.S. v. Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557 (9th Cir. 2004) • Internet AOL IM chats with 14 yr-old girl; sexually explicit conversations; defendant persisted in trying to a

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA00079477 COURT CASES , FAC:ILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v.

11856 (9th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6) No Information U.S. v. Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557 (9i° Cir. 2004) Internet AOL 1M chats with 14 yr-old girl; . sexually explicit conversations; defendant persisted in trying to a

no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor, court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder. Internet No information available. 2422(b) 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Sting Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 38874 (W.D. Mo

entence even if Sentencing Guidelines were found unconstitutional. 42 EFTA00226354 - COURT CAgill FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION ca • U.S. I Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557 (9th Cir. 2004) Internet AOL 1M chats with 14 yr-old girl; sexually explicit conversations; defendant persisted in trying to arra

thrrime. See nited States v. Root, 296 t3d 1222, 1227-32 ( 1°' Cir. 2002). United States Sims, 428 3d 945, 959 (10° Cir. 1 005); United States I Helder, 45213d 751 (8th Cir. 2006); United States !Meek, 366 3d 705, 717-20 (9th Cir. 2004). Likewise, the Circuits have rejected void or vagueness, overb

325 (111° Cir. 2005). 6) Section 2422(b) is not unconstitutionally overbroad or vague. U.S.' Thomas, 410'. 3d 1235 (10" Cir. 2005) • I Also U.S. I Dhingra, 311 I. 3d 557, 161-63 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S.' Meek, 366 3d 705, 720- 22 (9" Cir. 2004); U.S. Panti I, 338 3d 1299, 1300-01 (I I" Cir. 2003); U.S.