Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

. daughter) in another chat room; D wanted to rent daughter. D gave his phone # to u/c and u/c called him to speak about arrangements. Next day D & u/c had further conversation thru the chat room. 4 days later D called u/c on phone making meeting arrangements & agreed to pay $300. D arrested at

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

. daughter) in another chat room; D wanted to rent daughter. D gave his phone # to u/c and u/c called him to speak about arrangements. Next day D & u/c had further conversation thru the chat room. 4 days later D called u/c on phone making meeting arrangements & agreed to pay $300. D arrested at

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

. daughter) in another chat room; D wanted to rent daughter. D gave his phone # to u/c and u/c called him to speak about arrangements. Next day D & u/c had further conversation thru the chat room. 4 days later D called u/c on phone making meeting arrangements & agreed to pay $300. D arrested at