Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

sadvantage, the auditor was seen as a rather colorless individual whofollowed technical rules in the manner of the archetypical Dickensian clerk or Weberian bureaucrat. Within the profession and amongst those with close ties to the profession, there was keen awareness of crucial shifts that began in the

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

sadvantage, the auditor was seen as a rather colorless individual whofollowed technical rules in the manner of the archetypical Dickensian clerk or Weberian bureaucrat. Within the profession and amongst those with close ties to the profession, there was keen awareness of crucial shifts that began in the

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

sadvantage, the auditor was seen as a rather colorless individual whofollowed technical rules in the manner of the archetypical Dickensian clerk or Weberian bureaucrat. Within the profession and amongst those with close ties to the profession, there was keen awareness of crucial shifts that began in the