Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

of internet to entice 14047 2252(a)(1) minor to engage in sex activity. Knowingly transported child pornography in interstate commerce. 05- Robert Latham 2 18 U.S.C.S. Use of internet to entice 14060 2252(a)(1) minor to engage in sex activity. Knowingly transported 10 EFTA00176545 child por

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

f internet to entice 14047 2252(aX1) minor to engage in sex ' activity. Knowingly transported child pornography in interstate commerce. 05- Robert Latham 2 18 U.S.C.S. Use of Internet to entice 14060 2252(a)(1) minor to engage in sex activity. Knowingly transported 10 EFTA00284212 child por

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

se of intemet to entice 14047 2252(aX1) minor to engage in sex activity. Knowingly transported child pornography in interstate commerce. 05- Robert Latham 2 18 U.S.C.S. Use of intemet to entice 14060 2252(a)(1) minor to engage in sex activity. Knowingly transported 10 EFTA00226790 child pomo