Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

ce 14032 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- William Kama! I [None] Use of intemet to entice 14063 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- Andres Rojas I [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20040 as minor girl) on intemet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with u/c ofc. 04- Car

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

ce minor to engage in sex activity. 04- 14063 William Kamal 1 [None] Use of intemet to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 04- 20040 Andres Rojas 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as minor girl) on Internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with u/c ofc. 04- 20055 Ca

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

ce 14032 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- William Kemal I [None] Use of intemet to entice 14063 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- Andres Rojas 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20040 as minor girl) on intemet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with u/c ofc. 04- Car