Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

e of having sex; D asked u/c to call him once she reached the meeting point; u/c called; D arrested at meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- John Orrega I [None} D met u/c officer (posing 20408 as 13 y.o. girl) on Internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up m

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

ving sex; D asked u/c to call him once she reached the meeting point; u/c called; D arrested at meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- 20408 John Orrega 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on Internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting on

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

ving sex; D asked u/c to call him once she reached the meeting point; u/c called; D arrested at meeting site. (Affidavit attached). 02- 20408 John Orrega I [None] I) met t✓c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on intemet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with oft., set up meeting