Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

ngage in sex activity. 00-6034 John Palmer 2 18 U.S.C.S. 2252A(a)(5)(B) Use of internet to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 01-0704 Michael Nyberg 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

ngage in sex activity. 00-6034 John Palmer 2 18 U.S.C.S. 2252A(a)(5)(B) Use of internet to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 01.0704 Michael Nyberg 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on Internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

engage in sex activity. 00-6034 John Palmer 2 18 U.S.C.S. 2252A(a)(5)(B) Use of intemet to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 01-0704 Michael Nyberg 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on intemet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with ofc., set up meeting o