Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

stitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1972). (10.) R. C. Schank and R. P. Abelson, Scripts, Plans. Goals, and Understanding, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1977). (11.) R. E. Cullingford, Script Application: Computer Understanding of Newspaper Stories, Technical Report YALE/DCS/trl 16, Computer Sc

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

nstitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1972). (10.) R. C. Schank and R. P. Abelson, Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, L Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1977). (11.) R. E. Cullingford, Script Application: Computer Understanding of Newspaper Stories, Technical Report YALE/DCS/tr116, Computer Sci

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

stitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (1972). (10.) R. C. Schank and R. P. Abelson, Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1977). (II.) R. E. Cullingford, Script Application: Computer Understanding of Newspaper Stories, Technical Report YALE/DCS/tr116, Computer Sci