Epstein Secrets

ate or otherwise interact improperly with persons who turn out to be minors. A prosecution of Mr. Epstein would violate the teachings of Bailey and Panfil. As we believe we persuaded you at the June 26th meeting, Mr. Epstein never targeted minors. On the contrary, what he did — at worst — was akin to

in thecommunity--exemplified by their defense in the famous Sacco-Vanzetticase of the 1920s--Hill and Barlow partners epitomized what legal scholar Anthony Kronman has called "lawyer statesmen." For outsiders, there was little reason to suspect any significant problems at Hill and Barlow-- and none whatsoever t

ingly' persuade or entice, or attempt to persuade or entice, minors. United States v. Bailey 228 F.3d 637, 639 (6th Cir. 2000). See United States v. Panfil, 338 F.3d 10 Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though

t in thecommunity--exemplified by their defense in the famous Sacco-Vanzetticase of the 1920s—Hill and Barlow partners epitomized what legal scholar Anthony Kronman has called "lawyer statesmen? For outsiders, there was little reason to suspect any significant problems at Hill and Barlow-- and none whatsoever to

gly' persuade or entice, or attempt If to persuade or entice, minors. United States Bailey, 228 F.3d 637, 639 (611' Cir. 2000). See United States' Panfil, 338 I3d 1D Indeed, this last problem is best illustrated by any calls may claim to have made to solicit persons to massage Mr. Epstein. Though Ms

in thecommunity--exemplified by their defense in the famous Sacco-Vanzetticase of the I 920s--Hill and Barlow partners epitomized what legal scholar Anthony Kronman has called "lawyer statesmen." For outsiders, there was little reason to suspect any significant problems at Hill and Barlow-- and none whatsoever t