Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JE.H.REY EPSTEIN Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-cv-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON

nsion of Time in which to Respond to Plaintiff, Jane Does's Motions to Compel EFTA00728694 Responses to Request to Produce, Answers to Request for Admissions, and Answers to Interrogatories. Having considered Defendant's motion and Plaintiff's counsel being in agreement with the requested extension, it i

07'13'2009 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN! Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, JEFFRE

erted his Fifth Amendment privilege is response to Jane Doe's Request for Admissions 6, 21 and 22. See Epstein's Response to Jane Doe's Request for Admissions attached as Exhibit C to Injunction Motion (DE #165). Based on this unsupported presumption of fraudulent transfer, Jane Doe asks the Court to impo

HERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAIJOHNSON CASE NO: 08-CV-80232-MARRAIJOHNSON CASE NO: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/J

For example, Jane Doe has asked Epstein to admit that he committed sexual assault against Jane Doe when she was minor. Plaintiffs First Request for Admissions to Defendant Epstein 11. In response, Epstein asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege not to incriminate himself. For all these reasons, directing