Epstein Secrets

or: SCOTT STACKMANYLYLE CASRiEL 212-821-7000/800-308-3140 Equities Common stock Purchase price/ Trade kun-ber Average price Price per share Witte on undesired sicking sicicing due of stares per share (1) Con basis (a) on Ian 300/ /an 30(1) Win or IOSS (1) period BANK OF AMER CORP S

e SP( name arrow mem orb Dividend It Mrevinten Program Ora) the Frey metered dal threw ono? You mar °Man the aural age from your Noma Admor Only Miele does are sochard infer MP. partial Mates MI to soli and the caswil beat:66M et you amours Median-4 remysthem pro tabbed by the issuer nor Mkt bon

LANCE VulTI I TI .E ENDING BALANCE OF THIS STATEMENT FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS WOMB NOT CREWED BY TIE BANK A.X• 6*) Eiscires na oaf By Inseam $ Witte I 41 tU3Saidre Qeda DATE AMOUNT TOTAL CHECKS OUTSTANDING NUMBER MOUNT TOTAL If your checksook and account statement balances do not match, ve

. rev, Rave Line or your ea EØ teed Ca /re ~ewe 6 macron yea ant weeduscratert ra Puerc tem. EnalleN RFN Bwee3 Oferr Tel Era le4C . Sa, km PR Miele> rati-e San Ca« :SI-re,11/17 moSE6545,! Ecr UV Ante* Peke439WD St "Tan ..10:403 rase. Ste:terra al 3eiNiaS9er ,44.54107fnt Es Ern FraiSin

:lendInterest period Your Finandal Advisor: SCOTT STACK MANLYLE CASRIEL Oafs et period Ceparca:II (I) Your total assets 87,475 58 87,478.94 Witte On Dec 31 (I) Pertentaged Cost ESbrnaed your aCCOunt tress (I) annual intone 250.000.00 tinreari7KI gain or loss (5) Cash Cult and money i

by UBS of a pekula mutual fund famik, to our <lints; and CO the asset value of apnioalr mutual fund I amitis shares held at tie Irm — We and CU" Miele also recewe nemorking and embus proceseing lees in consideration for transfer agent serves that we provide to the mutual fads. These lees generall

.446-1(e)(2)(iii) (inventory to depreciable asset). See also Cargill Inc. v. U.S. 91 F.Supp.2d 1293, 1298 (D. Minn., 2000) ("Like the petitioner in Witte, Cargill has not directed the Court to any provision of the Code that sets forth such a "characterization" exception. Accordingly, the Court conclud

item, that is, this is a change in the proper time for the taking of a deduction from the year incurred to the year paid." 71 T.C. at 919. See also, Miele v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 284 (1979), Pierce Ditching Co. Inc. v. Commissioner, 73 T.C. 301 (1979), Brunton v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-166. I