Epstein Secrets

. Nothing contained herein should be deemed to be prediction or projection of future performance of the Underlying Fund or the Access Fund. NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu

. Nothing contained herein should be deemed to be prediction or projection of future performance of the Underlying Fund or the Access Fund. NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu

. Nothing contained herein should be deemed to be prediction or projection of future performance of the Underlying Fund or the Access Fund. NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu

. Nothing contained herein should be deemed to be prediction or projection of future performance of the Underlying Fund or the Access Fund. NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu

LY CONFIDENTIAL FOR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL AND QUALIFIED INVESTOR USE ONLY 2 EFTA01398144 Greg Martin Important Information (Continued) NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

in Capital; IRR = Internal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01398169 Greg Martin Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%

ESTMENT PROFESSIONAL AND QUALIFIED INVESTOR USE ONLY 2 EFTA01396784 GLDUS126 Pacific Life Insurance Co Important Information (Continued) NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

ernal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01396809 GLDUS126 Pacific Life Insurance Co Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%

FOR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL AND QUALIFIED INVESTOR USE ONLY 2 EFTA01397457 GLDUS127 Annandale Capital Important Information (Continued) NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

RR = Internal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01397482 GLDUS127 Annandale Capital Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%

ENTIAL FOR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONAL AND QUALIFIED INVESTOR USE ONLY 2 EFTA01396107 GLDUS125 Gerald Ford Important Information (Continued) NOTE: Historical returns presented herein do not include any fees and expenses that would be associated with an investment in the Access Fund, which would have the

tal; IRR = Internal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01396132 GLDUS125 Gerald Ford Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%