Epstein Secrets

e landing, and a temporary barge landing to provide access to Great St. James Island. There is currently a small pile-supported dock located within Shallow Bay on the north side of the island. The bay is very shallow and vessels accessing the dock have damaged the shallow seagrass beds within the bay. At o

hed. Their qualifications statement will also be in the Appendix of the revised EAR. Letter: The removal of the dock which was not permitted by the USACE is now descripted in the EAR section 5.00. These areas are highlighted for ease of review in the revised EAR. The following has been added to the l

ge landing, and a temporary barge landing to provide access to Great St. James Island. There is currently a small pile-supported dock located within Shallow Bay on the north side of the island. The toy is very shallow and vessels accessing the dock have damaged the shallow seagrass beds within the bay. At on

f the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner despite not receiving the federal permit and notices were issued by the USACE requesting the removal of' the unpermitted structure. The dock however was never removed. The applicant, understands the issues with the existing do

e looking at should not be a problem or so=ething very minor. I plan to use their visit to push the new docks. We can show them how shallow it is in Shallow Bay and why we want to=move. Amy Clai=e Dempsey, M.A. President, =ioimpact, Inc. P.O. Box 132=Kingshill St. Croix, U.S. V=rgin Islands 00851 Fax <t

d=, as well as concerns for resources. Terry Wells <=font>and I would like to conduct a site visit. Very respectfully, Jonathan Pempek Biologist- USACE =br> (Terry Wel=s is the enforcement person for our district.) Can you provide a date that yo= can accommodate our inspection in the last two week

delete the copy you received. Thank you. On 2/28/18, 11:38 AM, ' > wrote: >CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED >Erika, >Thank you for the update. >The Shallow Bay dock USACE application should indicate compensation for >the proposed dock is removal of the current dock. I will notify the >Antilles office they

you received. Thank you. On 2/28/18, 11:38 AM, ' > wrote: >CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED >Erika, >Thank you for the update. >The Shallow Bay dock USACE application should indicate compensation for >the proposed dock is removal of the current dock. I will notify the >Antilles office they can review

The dock has been designed so that barges can approach and land on the end of the dock while vessels can dock along the "L.". The existing dock in Shallow Bay which is not permitted by the USACE in its current configuration will be removed upon completion of a usable new dock. It is understood that your a

can approach and land on the end of the dock while vessels can dock along the "L.". The existing dock in Shallow Bay which is not permitted by the USACE in its current configuration will be removed upon completion of a usable new dock. It is understood that your approval of the renewal must be first

e landing, and a temporary barge landing to provide access to Great St. James Island. There is currently a small pile-supported dock located within Shallow Bay on the north side of the island. The bay is very shallow and vessels accessing the dock have damaged the shallow seagrass beds within the bay. At o

the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner despite not receiving the federal permit and notices were issued by the USACE requesting the removal of the unpermitted structure. The dock however was never removed. The applicant, understands the issues with the existing do

e landing, and a temporary barge landing to provide access to Great St. James Island. There is currently a small pile-supported dock located within Shallow Bay on the north side of the island. The bay is very shallow and vessels accessing the dock have damaged the shallow seagrass beds within the bay. At o

the shallowness of the bay. The dock was constructed by the previous owner despite not receiving the federal permit and notices were issued by the USACE requesting the removal of the unpermitted structure. The dock however was never removed. The applicant understands the issues with the existing doc