Epstein Secrets

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

Adjudicated A Level I Offender. A. Based on the Relevant Facts Supported by Clear and Convincing Evidence, Jeffrey Epstein Falls Squarely within Level 1 As set forth in the completed SORA Risk Assessment Instrument on the following two pages, a proper calculation of Jeffrey Epstein's risk assessment

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

Adjudicated a Level 1 Offender. A. Based on the Relevant Facts Supported by Clear and Convincing Evidence, Jeffrey Epstein Falls Squarely within Level 1 As set forth in the completed SORA Risk Assessment Instrument on the following two pages, a proper calculation of Jeffrey Epstein's risk assessment

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

Adjudicated A Level 1 Offender. A. Based on the Relevant Facts Supported by Clear and Convincing Evidence, Jeffrey Epstein Falls Squarely within Level 1 As set forth in the completed SORA Risk Assessment Instrument on the following two pages, a proper calculation of Jeffrey Epstein's risk assessment