Epstein Secrets

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

t. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matter of discretion") (citing People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 568 n.2 (2009); People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 418, 421 (2008)). As noted above, Jeffrey Epstein presents a negligible risk of r

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

t. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matter of discretion") (citing People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 568 n.2 (2009); People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 418, 421 (2008)). As noted above, Jeffrey Epstein presents a negligible risk of r

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

t. 2010) (observing "the risk level designated in the RAI is merely presumptive, and a court may depart from it as a matter of discretion") (citing People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 568 n.2 (2009); People v. Johnson, 11 N.Y.3d 416, 418, 421 (2008)). As noted above, Jeffrey- Mr. Epstein presents a negligible risk