Epstein Secrets

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

belongs. II. Jeffrey Epstein Poses Little To No Threat Of Reoffending Or Causing Harm To The Public Safety Of The People Of New York A. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the first and primary factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offenses

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

rk and Florida, just barely falls within the range of conduct viewed as sufficiently harmful to trigger SORA registration requirements. B. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the second factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offenses. Indeed, t

rd of Examiners of Sex Offenders with the knowledge that they will be relied on by courts generally constitute "reliable hearsay" in SORA hearings, the New York Court of Appeals has held that a Board case summary "may be rejected when it is unduly speculative or its accuracy is undermined by other more compelling evidence."

belongs. II. Jeffrey Epstein Poses Little To No Threat Of Reoffending Or Causing Harm To The Public Safety Of The People Of New York A. Risk of Reoffense With respect to the first and primary factor in a SORA assessment, Jeffrey-Mr. Epstein presents little to no risk of committing further sexual offe