Epstein Secrets

has sent multiple packages within approximately the last year (the "Scott Borgerson Phone"). The most recent contact between Target Cellphone-1 and the Scott Borgerson Phone occurred in or about August 2019. 13. Accordingly, I respectfully submit there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-1

30 days, Target Cellphone-2 has been in contact with the Isabel Maxwell Phone, the Laura Menninger Phone, the Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone, and the Scott Borgerson Phone. 15. Accordingly, I respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-2 will reveal the location of

order the Service Providers to provide this data pursuant to a warrant 2 See In re Application, 460 F. Supp. 2d 448, 459-60 & n. 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re

has sent multiple packages within approximately the last year (the "Scott Borgerson Phone"). The most recent contact between Target Cellphone-1 and the Scott Borgerson Phone occurred in or about August 2019. 13. Accordingly, I respectfully submit there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-1

30 days, Target Cellphone-2 has been in contact with the Isabel Maxwell Phone, the Laura Menninger Phone, the Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone, and the Scott Borgerson Phone. 15. Accordingly, I respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-2 will reveal the location of

order the Service Providers to provide this data pursuant to a warrant 2 See In re Application, 460 F. Supp. 2d 448, 459-60 & n. 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re

has sent multiple packages within approximately the last year (the "Scott Borgerson Phone"). The most recent contact between Target Cellphone-1 and the Scott Borgerson Phone occurred in or about August 2019. 13. Accordingly, I respectfully submit there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-1

30 days, Target Cellphone-2 has been in contact with the Isabel Maxwell Phone, the Laura Menninger Phone, the Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone, and the Scott Borgerson Phone. 15. Accordingly, I respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-2 will reveal the location of

order the Service Providers to provide this data pursuant to a warrant 2 See In re Application, 460 F. Supp. 2d 448, 459-60 & n. 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re

has sent multiple packages within approximately the last year (the "Scott Borgerson Phone"). The most recent contact between Target Cellphone-1 and the Scott Borgerson Phone occurred in or about August 2019. 13. Accordingly, I respectfully submit there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-1

30 days, Target Cellphone-2 has been in contact with the Isabel Maxwell Phone, the Laura Menninger Phone, the Haddon, Morgan, & Foreman Phone, and the Scott Borgerson Phone. 15. Accordingly, I respectfully submit that there is probable cause to believe that the location of Target Cellphone-2 will reveal the location of

order the Service Providers to provide this data pursuant to a warrant 2 See In re Application, 460 F. Supp. 2d 448, 459-60 & n. 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re

ntact with a phone identified as the Scott Borgerson Phone within the last 30 days. In fact, the Target Cellphone was most recently in contact with the Scott Borgerson Phone in or about March 2020. The errors resulted from my misreading of certain phone records for the Target Cellphone. In particular, while one ' The or

order the Service Provider to provide this data pursuant to a warrant 2 See In re Application, 460 F. Supp. 2d 448, 459-60 & n. 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re

ntact with a phone identified as the Scott Borgerson Phone within the last 30 days. In fact, the Target Cellphone was most recently in contact with the Scott Borgerson Phone in or about March 2020. The errors resulted from my misreading of certain phone records for the Target Cellphone. In particular, while one ' The or

order the Service Provider to provide this data pursuant to a warrant 2 See In re Application, 460 F. Supp. 2d 448, 459-60 & n. 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re

ntact with a phone identified as the Scott Borgerson Phone within the last 30 days. In fact, the Target Cellphone was most recently in contact with the Scott Borgerson Phone in or about March 2020. The errors resulted from my misreading of certain phone records for the Target Cellphone. In particular, while one 1 The or

order the Service Provider to provide this data pursuant to a warrant 2 See In re Application, 460 F. Supp. 2d 448, 459-60 & n. 55 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Kaplan, J.) (cellphone location information falls within § 2703(c)(1)); accord, e.g., United States v. Caraballo, 963 F. Supp. 2d 341, 361 (D.Vt. 2013); In re