Epstein Secrets

9CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort L

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

02009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack GWcx T i -,Es • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort L

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

40800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . • Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd. Suite 700 Fort L

king of Epstein's affidavit is warranted. Edwards does not contend that Epstein failed to comply with a court order as contemplated by Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; nor does Edwards assert that Epstein's affidavit contains material that should be stricken from a pleading as delineated in Rule 1.140 o

9CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort L

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

02009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack GWcx T i -,Es • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. 1 East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort L

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

9CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik, Esq. I East Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort L

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder