Epstein Secrets

including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases agains

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB AG SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik E a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. s; S 9 COFFEY B URLINGTON OI+ICk IN THE DROVE. PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33 133

EXHIBIT A EFTA00596488 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defen

700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, etc., et al. Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB-AG Dear Mr. Scarola and Mr. Nurik: Enclosed please find a proposed draft for our Initial Case Management Report and Conference. I regret the delay, however we have had extreme diff

OUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff; v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Case No. 50 2009CA0408003OOOCMB AG JOINT STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 1201(b), FLA.R.CIV.PRO. AND CASE MANAGEMENT It I. PORT

without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Roberts, Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases agains

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.1201 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMB AG SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

d consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik Es , a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. M.P ICSAM 9 COFFEY B 1./RLINGTON OFFICE IN THE GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defenda

9680 Page 20 1 behalf; that is, who purports to represent 2 Mr. Rothstein since you left the firm that day? 3 A. No. 4 Q. Do you know Mr. Nurik? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Do you recog -- are you aware that he 7 represents Mr. Rothstein? A. Yes. 9 Q. Okay. Have you spoken with him since that

Page 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- VOLUME I OF II SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III.