Epstein Secrets

show cause proceedings and depositions, and in support thereof, states: INTRODUCTION Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards"), along with Fanner Jaffe and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe (collectively, the "Bankruptcy Movants") have moved the Bankruptcy Court for an Order to show cause why a N

ler White had in its files and turned over in February 2018 to Epstein's current trial counsel, Link & Rockenbach. The Bankruptcy Movants claim that Fowler White's retention of the disc is a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order and they seek sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for that retention.

Raymond B. Ray in case 09-34791. 4. The subject documents were prepared by Berger Singerman in that exact format for the sole purpose of allowing Fanner Jaffe to review the documents in 2010 to determine whether applicable privileges applied to any or all of the communications. leg Judge Ray's Order below.

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or conies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

er Jaffe Wcissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL said in its March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Fanner Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of the confidential documents and

cution case, Farmer Jaffe asserts. On March 7, Epstein's current counsel gave Edwards' counsel a flash drive its said duplicated a disc it found in Fowler White's files and provided a sworn affidavit from a paralegal saying she had obtained the materials from Fowler White's files. According to the motion, dur

PTER 11 Debtor. NOTICE OF JOINT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Movants, Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., hereby voluntarily dismiss their respective Motion's for Contempt against Jeffrey

in its capacity as legal counsel to Jeffrey Epstein. Any violation that occurred with respect to Jeffrey Epstein individually is as a consequence of Fowler White's wrongdoing. The moving parties are therefore dropping the Motion for Contempt against Jeffrey Epstein in order to focus the attention where it is m

of the Amended Exhibit List in the state court in March 2018. There is not even an allegation that Fowler White used the documents on the disk which Fanner Jaffe claims to be privileged. The worst that can be said is that a CD sat unused in Fowler White's files. Farmer Jaffe and Bradley Edwards seek sanction

. Movants request sanctions against Fowler White, a law firm which withdrew from representing any party in this case nearly six years ago. DE 3034. Fowler White's investigation has not revealed how the offending CF ended up in its files since it sent the disk back to Special Master Carney after printing the do