Epstein Secrets

AROLA: I am going to object. That calls for attorney-client privilege. Id. at page 98; line 24-25. Q: All right. At the time you began representing E.W. or at any time prior to the filing of the lawsuit against the United States Government in July of '08, did you learn whether she was listed as a, o

reet, Fort Lauderdale, FL 3330I• 954.467.1223 EFTA00799405 lines 20-21. Q: During that time that you have been involved in this case on behalf of E.W., has Mr. Howell participated in the case; that is, has he done work on the case? Id. at page 90; lines 20-23. A: Yes. Id. at page 90; line 24. Q:

201; line 4-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 201; line 7-9. Q: If you're unaware of the existence of the entity called Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, would it be a correct statement that you have never authorized anyone from Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, to conduc

AROLA: I am going to object. That calls for attorney-client privilege. Id. at page 98; line 24-25. Q: All right. At the time you began representing E.W. or at any time prior to the filing of the lawsuit against the United States Government in July of '08, did you learn whether she was listed as a, o

Attorney-Client and work-product privileges. Id. at page 89; lines 20-21. Q: During that time that you have been involved in this case on behalf of E.W., 3 It is significant to note that other jurisdictions have sanctioned counsel for just this behavior during deposition. See e.g. Van Pilsum v. Iow

201; line 4-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 201; line 7-9. Q: If you're unaware of the existence of the entity called Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, would it be a correct statement that you have never authorized anyone from Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, to conduc

answer the threshold "yes" or "no" question: Did [Mr. Howell] ever relate that to you." Id. 9. Edwards in one instance when asked what his client E.W. told him on the phone, himself claimed privilege. Id. at 90. Later, when asked "for what purpose did Ms. L.M. originally hire you?," his attorney o

orm any investigation on the Epstein files? A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Q. If you're unaware of the existence of the entity called Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, would it be a correct statement that you have never authorized anyone from Blue Line Research to conduct any investigation of