Epstein Secrets

stina ICitterman k. Dean Kretschmar 1. Michael Legamaro 16. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, M. or E.W., cases used in connection with Investor meetings and/or general Investor solicitation into the Rothstein Ponzi Scheme. 17. Any employment agreemen

oquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff means =. (MI. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA0280S1XXXXMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA0280S8XXXXIVIB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case

nd any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 4. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or rep

as g. Andrew Barnett 9 EFTA00722468 h. Bradley Edwards 15. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe,. or E.W., cases used in connection with Investor meetings and/or general Investor solicitatio the Rothstein Ponzi Scheme. 16. Any employment agreements or

nd any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 3. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or rep

quialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #

d any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (Including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 4. All emalls, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, and/or a

oc 1063 Filed 10/13/10 Page 7 of 8 h. Bradley Edwards 15. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W., cases used in connection with Investor meetings and/or general Investor solicitation into the Rothstein Ponzi Scheme. 16. Any employment agreemen

nd any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 3. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Scott W. Rothstein, and/or any attorney or rep

answer the threshold "yes" or "no" question: Did [Mr. Howell] ever relate that to you." Id. 9. Edwards in one instance when asked what his client E.W. told him on the phone, himself claimed privilege. Id. at 90. Later, when asked "for what purpose did Ms. L.M. originally hire you?," his attorney o

tographs . ...? MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and instruction. Id. at 199, lines 25, 1-12. Q. [regarding Patrick Roberts] Did he ever perform investigation work on any of the Epstein files? MR. SCAROLA: Same objection [work-product, attorney-client privilege] and ins

uialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051,OOO(MB), E.W. (EVV. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058)OOOO48), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case

d any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 4. All emalls, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwards, Scott W. Rothstein, and/or a