Epstein Secrets

ve the anxiety and emotional distress he has suffered every single day over the last eight years is by bringing his three clients into Court — L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe — to testify about their claims against Epstein, which they settled more than seven years ago. The three individuals have no interest

clear that the CVRA proceeding is going to be a focal point of this case, Epstein is filing a Response to Edwards' Motion with a request to reopen E.W.'s deposition as well. Epstein incorporates those arguments herein. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above and in Epstein's Response to Edwards' Mo

een furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 8, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCICENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 [fax] By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBI' Kara Berard Rockenbacliala Ang

cuments will be disclosed and there will be no adequate remedy. Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein is referred to by proper name. Non-party interveners, E.W., B.B. and The Post are referred to as E.W., B.B. and The Post. All emphasis is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A

ith notice to the United States, the other party to the Agreement. (A-6). Rather than seeking relief from Judge Marra in federal court, non- party E.W., a victim of Mr. Epstein, filed a motion in the state criminal action on May 12, 2009, seeking to intervene and unseal the non-prosecution agreemen

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)

discs that they had in their possession. • On March 6, 2018, Epstein filed his Notice of No Objection to Attorney Paul Cassell, on Behalf of L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, or Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Moving to Seal Court Records Until the Court Makes a Determination on How the Docum

been furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on March 21, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA By: /s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBI_ Kara Berard Rockenbach Rachel J. Glasser FBN Primary: Primary: P

ments will be disclosed and there will be no adequate remedy. I Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein is referred to by proper name. Non-party interveners, E.W., B.B. and The Post are referred to as E.W., B.B. and The Post. All emphasis is supplied unless indicated otherwise. The following symbol is used: A

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A- 12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.

notice to the United States, the other party to the Agreement. (A-6). • Rather than seeking relief from Judge Marra in federal court, non- party E.W., a victim of Mr. Epstein, filed a motion in the state criminal action on May 12, 2009, seeking to intervene and unseal the non-prosecution agreemen

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)