Epstein Secrets

at simply says that the motion for 16 protective order is denied for the reasons 17 stated on the record and the amended protective 18 order in E.W.'s case is denied for reasons 19 stated on the record, that will be fine. 20 MR. BERGER: Judge, I've just drafted - I 21 know Mr. Critton wants

nt here is I haven't 10 asked one question to anybody yet in terms of 11 the deposition. What I did was, is I set 12 E.W. -- 13 THE COURT: And E.W. is the same lady who 14 the transcript -- 15 MR. CRITTON: Transcript has 16 and are the same person, §§§. is the same 17 person, and Jane Doe

om the essential requirement of law in granting this discovery," and it refers to a case called Smith vs. TIB Bank of the Keys, 687 So.2d. 895, a Third District case, 1997, and that quotation then from that case by the Fifth in the Ballast case says "by alleging fraud as well as breach EFTA00776412 48 1

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas, They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

80827 Page 2 of I I Westlaw 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 Ha. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 So.2d 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant, v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appellee. No. 99.2182. Oct. 27, 1999. Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1999. Following divorce, parties

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas. They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

EFTA00231327 Page 2 of I I Wdstlaw. 76912d 389 769 2d 389 Fla. L. Weekly D2439 (Cite as: 769 ..241 389) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. Deborah PEREZ, Appellant, v. Jorge M. PEREZ, Appel lee. No. 99.2182. Oct. 27, 1999. Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1999. Following divorce, parties