Epstein Secrets

y in this case are Jeffrey Epstein (via video deposition), Bradley Edwards, Scott Rothstein (via video deposition), and Mr. Edwards' clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe). Source: Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Civil) 201.1 Given Given as Modified Denied Withdrawn 5 EFTA00804794 PLAINTIFF/CO

NDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S NOTICE OF PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT FORM Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.470, files this Notice of Proposed Jury Instructions and Verdict Form. Epstein adopts Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards' (

s ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5) Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe") (collectively, the "Mediation Participants

ties Fowler White and Farmer Jaffe consent to the jurisdiction of this Court solely for purposes of participating in the mediation. 2. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720, Edwards, Epstein, the Intervenors and representatives from Fowler White and Farmer Jaffe who have the full authority to settle wit

in this case, Jack Scarola ("Scarola"), for their flagrant violation of the confidentiality agreements between Epstein and Edwards's clients L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, as well as enter an Order of entitlement to costs and attorneys' fees in favor of Epstein and against Edwards and Scarola. In support

z, 785 So. 2d 589, 591 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ("[M]erely attaching an unswom document ... does not . . . satisfy the procedural strictures inherent in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(e)."). Scarola and Edwards are veteran trial attorneys, are well aware of these Rules, and are more than familiar with the signific

OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420, Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, voluntarily dismiss with prejudice Edwards' Counterclaim and Intervenors' claims against Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and all ca

IN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420, Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards and Intervenors L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, voluntarily dismiss with prejudice Edwards' Counterc

t court. 2 At the March 8, 2018 hearing, University of Utah Law Professor, Paul G. Cassell, Esq., appeared pro hac vice below for non-parties L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, on a limited confidentiality issue not before this Court. On behalf of non-parties, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, Mr. Cassell filed an Uno

Edwards filed his motion to set case for trial, 7 EFTA00793699 the case was not at issue, and thus, the scheduled trial may not proceed based on Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1440.5 (App. 15). Upon receiving Edwards' Supplement to his Motion for Separate Trials, Epstein's counsel immediately researched the Rule

ls are attorney-client privileged communications between Edwards (or any other co-counsel) and Edwards' and Mr. Cassell's three tort clients (L.M., E.W. or Jane Doe). Rather, the majority of the documents are e- mails among attorneys and staff within RRA, with Mr. Cassell, and with media sources and d

ivilege log that this Court's predecessor, The Honorable David Crow, found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the dis

s ("Edwards"), (2) Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), (3) Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") and its insurer, (4) Intervenors Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. (collectively, "Intervenors"), and (5) Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe") (collectively, the "Mediation Participants

participate in mediation subject to this Agreed Mediation Confidentiality Order. The Court, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: I. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720, Edwards, Epstein, and representatives from Fowler White and Farmer Jaffe who have the full authority to settle without EFTA0079591

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas, They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

TEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. 1VIOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, B.B. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.230, for leave to intervene as a party in Mr. Epstein's criminal matter for the following reasons: 1. Applicant's intervention is in

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas. They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

EPSTEIN, JEFFREY E, Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW COMES NOW, Applicant, M. and requests this Court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.230, for leave to intervene as a party in Mr. Epstein's criminal matter for the following reasons: 1. Applicant's intervention is in