Epstein Secrets

se cases involving Epstein); b. Reached agreements to share attorneys fees with non-lawyers; c. Used investor money to pay plaintiffs (i.e., L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe) "up front" money such that plaintiffs would refuse to settle the Civil Actions; d. Conducted searches, wiretaps or intercepted conver

ed she worked at eleven (11) separate strip clubs, Including Cheetah which RRA represented and in which ROTHSTEIN may have owned an interest; and E.W. also worked at Platinum Showgirls in Boynton Beach, which was the subject of a recent police raid where dancers were allegedly selling prescriptio

g the amount of fees and costs properly owed to him by Mr. Epstein pursuant to the NPA. On February 16, 2010 Mr. Epstein's principal civil counsel Bob Critton advised Mr. Josefsberg in writing that he and Mr. Epstein would meet with Mr. Josefsberg on two occasions between now and March 1, 2010 to review M

S to strike. 14 THE MITNESS: Ho. Is BY MR. SCAROLA: IS Q If Jeffrey Epstein alleges in this 19 complaint against Bradley Edwards that III., E.W. or 24 Jane Doe voluntarily consented to their sexual 21 molestation, could Jeffrey Epstein have possibly made 22 that claim on the basis of any

law firm that 20 was representing Mr. Epstein while you were involved? 21 A well, lack Goldberger and the Luttier firm, I 22 believe. 33 0 Bob Critton. 24 A Critton. 23 0 Dld you know Bob Critton? Palm Beach Reporting Service, Inc. 561-471-2995 EFTA00798358 89 91 A Causally. 2 0 What

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07025-07027 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell ■. and E.W. v. Epstein — Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide

issible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect