Epstein Secrets

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00799564 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

considered appropriate in section (f). See Middlesex County Sewerage, 453 U.S. at 15. II. Petitioners' CVRA Claims Must Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Because They Are Not Constitutionally Ripe. Petitioners have claimed that the government violated the CVRA by denying them: the "reasonable right to confer" with prosecutors, when the USAO-S

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00795240 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

considered appropriate in section (f). See Middlesex County Sewerage, 453 U.S. at 15. II. Petitioners' CVRA Claims Must Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Because They Are Not Constitutionally Ripe. Petitioners have claimed that the government violated the CVRA by denying them: the "reasonable right to confer" with prosecutors, when the USAO-S

cument n ere. on 101 oc e age o costs and is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO 2008 CA 0 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and throu

considered appropriate in section (f). See Middlesex County Sewerage, 453 U.S. at 15. II. Petitioners' CVRA Claims Must Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Because They Are Not Constitutionally Ripe. Petitioners have claimed that the government violated the CVRA by denying them: the "reasonable right to confer" with prosecutors, when the USAO-S