Epstein Secrets

TA00234249 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM ent 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 27 of 100 nsor & Associates Ker.onanp and Transcripnca. Inc IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006 CF09454AXX STATE OF FLORIDA, - vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

upp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the f

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00799564 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

quest • A letter for apology from the U.S. Attorney's Office for violating Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's rights (DE 127, at 14, Bullet 11). 15 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circui

/05/2013 Page 71 of 101 Exhibit C EFTA00795240 ase -cv- ocumen n ere. on 101 oc e age o Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO =ICAO COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and through h

quest • A letter for apology from the U.S. Attorney's Office for violating Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's rights (DE 127, at 14, Bullet 11). 15 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circui

cument n ere. on 101 oc e age o costs and is within the jurisdictional limits of this Court. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.: SO 2008 CA 0 COMPLAINT Plaintiff, =, by and throu

quest • A letter for apology from the U.S. Attorney's Office for violating Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's rights (DE 127, at 14, Bullet 11). 15 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circui

TA00180369 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM ent 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 27 of 100 nsor R Associates Rernninp and Tranicriptinch Mc. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006 CF09454AXX STATE OF FLORIDA, -vs- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defenda

tipp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the f

TA00180432 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM ent 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 27 of 100 nsor & Associates 1cpaniny And Transcription. Inc IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006 CF09454AXX STATE OF FLORIDA, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.

upp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the f

FTA00232158 r Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM ent 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 27 of 100 nsor & Associates Rcpniap slid Tummy:in% Inc. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006 CF09454AXX STATE OF FLORIDA, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.

pp. 938, 941 (M.D. La. 1.981) (explaining that courts developed the fraudulent-joinder doctrine to protect "the right [of removal] granted to 8 In Bonner v. City of Prichard. 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the -----Laieventh-Cifeklit-Goen-of-Appeals-adepted-as-binding-preeedent-all dvcisiuns of