Epstein Secrets

art from ignoring the crucial facts, is shocking beyond belief). Is it putting my financial future at risk? It certainly was doing so. Of course, if Bainco and Max -- and you now indicate you too -- had continued with these practices, my financial future would have been at extreme risk. But the practice

is again shocking, and I will respond in due course. But perhaps you answer the specific question that I posed to you: do you accept the version of the Marital Trust that Max presented? I will repeat what I have written repeatedly, and you continue to avoid. According to Max, the Marital Trust was set up so that

art from ignoring the crucial facts, is shocking beyond belief). Is it putting my financial future at risk? It certainly was doing so. Of course, if Bainco and Max -- and you now indicate you too -- had continued with these practices, my financial future would have been at extreme risk. But the practice

is again shocking, and I will respond in due course. But perhaps you answer the specific question that I posed to you: do you accept the version of the Marital Trust that Max presented? I will repeat what I have written repeatedly, and you continue to avoid. According to Max, the Marital Trust was set up so that

zed that the conflict discussed in=connection with Gene's proposal extending to pursuing the matter of th= apparent disappearance of these funds. If Bainco continues to refus= to provide information, I will then have to pursue other methods. On Wed, Jul=11, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Deborah Pechet Quinan <-> w

r of the missing 100+k. What next? Also, how do you think we should react to Harry's disgusting petitio= to the court demanding full authority over the Marital Trust, including t=e insinuations about Valeria? Right now waiting t= see whether Max will respond to the queries. I rather doubt it. If legal actions ar

al Trust was only $1,000,00= until the Lexington house was sold and incorporated to it. This is = flat lie -- as the documents I sent you prove it (Bainco statement from December 2014 and Harry's e-mail from =ay 2015, when the Lexington house was sold). Also outrageous to say that the Trust was provid

dge was bought with half of a =ortgage with a commercial institution that we were paying monthly and with=half of the funds coming from a loan from the Marital Trust with the highest possible interest rate, when Noam =ould have bought it himself with the funds from his IRA, that was being di=tributed to them. The

an 22 2015, a distribution of $187,000 was made from the IRA=to the NC Revocable Trust, but we have been unable to determine where thes= funds went. Bainco informed Deborah that it was wired to my checkin= account, but the only deposit was $70,000, not the full amount. The= have not yet provided any inf

g to do with the technicalities of the handout that Har=y is graciously offering. I'll review the background, once again= As I've discusse= before, the Marital Trust was established in Carol's name for tax pur=oses. The obvious intention, clearly understood by Carol and me, and=of course Eric Menouya, was that it

ns, except the last, were made by direct transfer of =unds from the Marital Trust accounts to Noam's revocable trust account, =ntil recently held at Bainco (so as to those payments I believe they =an be verified by checking the quarterly statements for Noam's trust =ccount). The last payment (April 6, 2

8 10/5/2017 =8,528.96 1/3/2018 $5,029.18 4/6/2018 $5,719.13 All of =he distributions, except the last, were made by direct transfer of =unds from the Marital Trust accounts to Noam's revocable trust account, =ntil recently held at Bainco (so as to those payments I believe they =an be verified by checking the q

hing to ask, beca=se I never heard of it before your letter and have no idea what it is. There are no further distributions. That was arr=nged with Bainco when it became clear to them and us that distributions to the family were almost exhausting the obligatory IRA withdrawals. On the promissory note,

e paragraph you quoted from the Promissory Note specifies interest rates under two different conditions: 1) when there is a loan outstanding between the Marital Trust and Pershing; 2) when there is no such loan outstanding. At the moment there is no such loan outstanding. Therefore, the interest rate that applies

hing to ask, beca=se I never heard of it before your letter and have no idea what it is. There are no further distributions. That was arr=nged with Bainco when it became clear to them and us that distributions to the family were almost exhausting the obligatory IRA withdrawals. On the promissory note,

e paragraph you quoted from the Promissory Note specifies interest rates under two different conditions: 1) when there is a loan outstanding between the Marital Trust and Pershing; 2) when there is no such loan outstanding. At the moment there is no such loan outstanding. Therefore, the interest rate that applies

hard. That said, those reports only show the total amounts distributed to you or on your behalf f=om the trusts. From your gift tax returns and from Bainco's =ecords it would be possible to detail how much you gave to each of your ch=ldren and grandchildren (and how much you paid in tuitions) since 2009

A_R1_01791720 EFTA02602934 When you say they were con=eyed to Carol alone, what exactly does this mean? Conveyed to what? We have been discussing the Marital Trust. Were they conveyed =o this? To a different Trust? Later you refer to a "non-e=empt Trust". Is that a different one? If so, I should kno= more about

d how the survivo= would be as well. I've already=explained, once again, why you are radically misled about what happened to=my IRA under Max's and Bainco's supervision, until I started looki=g into it and ended the practices that were rapidly depleting it. You say that you learned about Valeria in 20=

ased on the technicality that=in setting up the trust in M's name for tax purposes, the funds were f=rst assigned to her revocable Trust and then to the Marital Trust, which w=s, of course, intended for the use of the survivor -- which is, for exampl=, why I have always selected the Trustees and should continue to