Epstein Secrets

repeatedly described to you, I would have no reason to consider his suggestions. Rather, I should continue with the practice up until now, and what Mommoy would have done had she been the survivor, and pick a trustee to replace Max when he resigns. Therefore, before we try any other steps, I'd like to

m the survivor, because the Trust, set up to save money for the three children, was set up in her name, which required first transferring funds to a Carol Chomsky revocable Trust and then to the marital trust -- the basis for Max's legalistic chicanery. I am asking again: do you accept this interpretation? If

repeatedly described to you, I would have no reason to consider his suggestions. Rather, I should continue with the practice up until now, and what Mommoy would have done had she been the survivor, and pick a trustee to replace Max when he resigns. Therefore, before we try any other steps, I'd like to

m the survivor, because the Trust, set up to save money for the three children, was set up in her name, which required first transferring funds to a Carol Chomsky revocable Trust and then to the marital trust -- the basis for Max's legalistic chicanery. I am asking again: do you accept this interpretation? If

brief, Max has concocted an interpretatio= that is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all. It is based on the outlandish idea that Mommoy and I had decided to split our assets so that she would make decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about allocation of m

anery. To repeat the main points, Eric set up the Trust in Mommoy's name for esta=e purposes. Trust law requires that the funds first pass through a Carol Chomsky Revocable Trust, then be transferred to the Marital Trust, where, of course, it is intended for the survivor. Seizing on this technicality, Max con