mother died, in 1972, my father was 78 years old, not a good time to be alone. Knew that well enough then, but it came home like a hammer blow when Mommoy was diagnosed in 2006 with incurable brain and lung cancer, and I was privately told by her physician that she had at most months to live -- never t

repeatedly described to you, I would have no reason to consider his suggestions. Rather, I should continue with the practice up until now, and what Mommoy would have done had she been the survivor, and pick a trustee to replace Max when he resigns. Therefore, before we try any other steps, I'd like to

repeatedly described to you, I would have no reason to consider his suggestions. Rather, I should continue with the practice up until now, and what Mommoy would have done had she been the survivor, and pick a trustee to replace Max when he resigns. Therefore, before we try any other steps, I'd like to

rief, Max has concocted an interpretation that is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all. It is based on the outlandish idea that Mommoy and I had decided to split our assets so that she would make decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about allocation of m

f there is, again, I'd like to know what it is and, crucially, what is the source. So far I haven't seen anything. To review the basic fads briefly, Mommoy and I worked out the estate planning a long time ago, with Eric Menoyo and (later) Palmer Dodge when he moved there. Our general plan at that time,

at because you disapprove of some of the suggestions made by your former lawyer and financial managers — many of which were based on choices you and Mommoy had made previously -- you will now not believe anything they tell you. That leaves us with no recourse to determine the truth about anything that h

t because you disapprove of some of the suggestions made by your former lawyer and financial managers -- many of which were based on choices you and Mommoy had made previously -- you will now not believe anything they tell you. That leaves us with no recour=e to determine the truth about anything that h

t because you disapprove of some of the suggestions made by your former lawyer and financial managers -- many of which were based on choices you and Mommoy had made previously -- you will now not believe anything they tell you. That leaves us with no recour=e to determine the truth about anything that h

t because you disapprove of some of the suggestions made by your former lawyer and financial managers -- many of which were based on choices you and Mommoy had made previously -- you will now not believe anything they tell you. That leaves us with no recour=e to determine the truth about anything that h

brief, Max has concocted an interpretatio= that is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all. It is based on the outlandish idea that Mommoy and I had decided to split our assets so that she would make decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about allocation of m

brief, Max ha= concocted an interpretation that is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all. It is based on the outlandish idea that Mommoy and I had decided to split our assets so that she would make decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about allocation of m

the details. In brief, Max has concocted an interpretation t=at is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all, based on t=e idea that Mommoy and I decided to split our assets so that she would mak= decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about a=location of my pa

mot=er died, in 1972, my father was 78 years old, not a good time to be alone. Knew that well enough then, but it came home like a hammer blow when Mommoy was diagnosed in 2006 with incurable brain and lung cancer, and I was priva=ely told by her physician that she had at most months to live -- never t