Epstein Secrets

rief, Max has concocted an interpretation that is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all. It is based on the outlandish idea that Mommoy and I had decided to split our assets so that she would make decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about allocation of m

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to y

brief, Max has concocted an interpretatio= that is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all. It is based on the outlandish idea that Mommoy and I had decided to split our assets so that she would make decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about allocation of m

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which is fla=ly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to yo

brief, Max ha= concocted an interpretation that is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all. It is based on the outlandish idea that Mommoy and I had decided to split our assets so that she would make decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about allocation of m

of your letter is Max's inte=pretation, which is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "in=ividual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to yo

the details. In brief, Max has concocted an interpretation t=at is technically legal but that clearly makes no sense at all, based on t=e idea that Mommoy and I decided to split our assets so that she would mak= decisions about allocation of her part and I would make decisions about a=location of my pa

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which=is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the craz= idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual=property,"and the other to for M to manage her "individual prope=ty." We had property jointly, not divided into mine a