Epstein Secrets

sanctions pursuant to Rule 30(dX2) aril (3)(A) and (C) (referencing Rule 37(aX5)), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and compelling the deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 within fifteen (15) days and as grounds therefore would state: 1. On August 16, 2009, the deposition of Jane Doe No. 4 was noticed for Septe

05-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV401194IARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOB NO. 2, Pla - v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 0940969, 09-80

has met her burden, should the Court consider adopting such extraordinary relief. On its face, the motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7. Discussion of Law Requiring the Denial of the Requested Protective Order Rule 26(c)(1XE), Fed.R.Civ P. (2009), gove

5-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOB NO. 2, Plaintiff I JEFFREY B. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,

has met her burden, should the Court consider adopting such extraordinary relief. On its face, the motion does not meet the necessary burden as to Jane Doe 4, or Jane Does 2, 3, 5, 6, or 7. Discussion of Law Requiring the Denial of the Requested Protective Order Rule 26(c)(1XE), Fed.R.Civ P. (2009), gove

5-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOB NO. 2, Plaintiff JEFFREY B. EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09