Epstein Secrets

OTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

ase 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT Z (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) . 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. T1) Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refe

N, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information arc realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refer

, ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) ded claims for damages in Jane Doe's federal action in rces s of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

• Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSO Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refer

THSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, L.M. in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for dirnages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLED Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COOT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, l8 U.S.C. §1956(h)) . 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. TD Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refer

ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS (who either know or should have known) and, at times, in her Civil Action against EPSTEIN: a) Included claims for de-triages in Jane Doe's federal action in excess of $50,000,000.00 rather than simply alleging the jurisdictional limits. b) Organized a Jane Doe TV media interview witho

ase 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 14 of 36 COUNT 2 (Money Laundering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1956(h)) . 1. The General Allegations and paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. 113 Bank, N.A., (hereinafter refe