Epstein Secrets

tirt & P.A. 1820513ismne Boulevard B.B. Susie 2218 4 Plaintiff Miami, Phone S 1, 6 ws- VOLUME al OF IV 7 8 Oa behalf of the Plaintiff, Jame Doe No. IL ISIDRO MAKIJEI. GARCIA, ESQUIRE GARCIA, MAINS& BOO-RINGER 9 224 Dan Awnuo Suite 90) West 33401 Dcfaxlinta. 10 tilde Phan( 9 11 in

tein would ask them to take off all 23 BY MR. WEINBERG: • 23 thek clothes, and they would take off as much clothes 24 • Q. Page 9 on So Ms. Jane Doe 4's 24 as they felt comfortable with and we re not forced to 25 . aaffidavit. date of birth is and she was 18 at the time of 25 take off

m what they did with the 14 $200 they received? 15 A. I might have. I can't recall at this time if 16 I did or didn't. 17 Q. Did you ever ask lane Doe 103 — strike that. 18 • • Jane Doe I.03 told you that she had received a 19 significant amount of money because she said she bad 20 • gone to

d either of the two Plaintiffs' lawyers have any conversations with you of A. Nothing case-related. It was just... Q. Same questions regarding Mr. Mermelsteln and 24 Mr. Horowitz flaw you ever spoken to them? 25 A. No. Page 451 1 me and pulling my trash. But other than that, that's 2 it. 3 Q. Who

ncorporate specific factual allegations from 2nd Amended Complaint 1.20 hr $360.00 03/25/2009 RHB Conference with paralegal regarding filing of Jane Doe's 2-5 Responses to 0.10 hr $30.00 Motions to Compel 03/25/2009 RHB Review Jane Doe's 2-7 2nd Amended Complaints for viable c/a, Count III 0.75 hr

II complaints for MJP; list dates and attorneys with phone numbers on depo charts; begin calling all counsel re: scheduling depositions; calls from Mermelsteln; receipt of fax from Mermelsteln; call from 1.90 hr $237.50 Edwards; calls from Jack Hill and Richard Willits; coordinate dates of availability;

7, CASE NO: 08-CV-80993 Plaintiff, vs. 9 JEFFREY EPSIEIN, 10 11 12 C.N.A., 13 Plaintiff, 14 Vs. 15 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 16 Defendant. 17 JANE DOE, CASE NO: 08.07-80893 18 Plaintiff, 19 Vs. 20 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 Defendant. CASE NO: 08.CV-80811 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 1 IN THE C

o guess, you're not required to assume because some lawyers ask you a leading question or suggested in a report or like the police report like Mr. Mermelsteln and Mr. Edwards did, that did you tell the police officers X, Y, or Z without showing you the statement. You're not required to guess, I want pers