Epstein Secrets

tted willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired. 26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had

act, and Jane Doe was thereby put in such imminent apprehension. 17. Epstein made an intentional, unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Jane Poe, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril. 18. Epstein intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person &Jane Doe, with the

the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 61h day of October, 2008: Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermeistein, Esq. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 60 Fax: ahorowitzehermanlaw.com jhermanehermanlaw.com Iriveraehermanlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff J

t al. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00606748 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al. Defendant. CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARFtNJOHNSON Related Cases: 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-8038

om Richard Horace Willits lawverswillitseaolcom Robert C. Josefsberg riosefsberagDoodhurst.com Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitzOsexabuseattornev.com Stuart S. Mermeistein [email protected] 3 EFTA00606751

ANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. / C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-80893-CIV-MARRAJJOHNSON Plaintiff, J I-PREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA-JOHNSON Plaintiff,

)10:2009 Page 10 of 11 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 10 Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-130119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermeistein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, H., 33160 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Ro

v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO QUASH SUBPOENA FOR DEPOSITION OF JANE DOE NO.3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY. AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and thro

g served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this Lay of April, 2009: Stuart S. Mermeistein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami. FL 33160 Fax: 305-931-0877 Counsel for Pl