Epstein Secrets

the existence of a non-prosecution agreement (NPA). After that day, the victims gradually became aware of the existence of the NPA, as reflected in Jane Doe's reply in support of her petition. See Exhibit 2. And in proceedings held over the next few months, Judge Marra ordered that the NPA be made availab

Government offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government clams that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so thee is no good basis for sealing. (Counse

red on FLSD Docket 07/11/2008 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN 1E: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by— _ D.C. JULY 1 2038 STEVEN 'LLANO.% )RE CLERK U.S. DiST. CT. S.D. OF P.A. • LV. !S. VICTIM'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESP

Government offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government clams that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so there is no good basis for sealing. (Couns

red on FLSD Docket 07/11/2008 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN 1E: JANE DOE, Petitioner. FILED by— _ D.C. JULY 1 2038 STEVEN 'LLANO.% )RE CLERK U.S. DiST. CT. S.D. OF P.A. • LV. !S. VICTIM'S REPLY TO GOVERNMENT'S RESP

Government offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government clams that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so there is no good basis for sealing. (Couns

tigators. S.R.'s status as a victim of a federal offense was confirmed when she was interviewed by 'Attorney Edwards filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without identifying which of his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, I will address facts related to C.W., T.M., and S.R. All three of

overnment offers two explanations for sealing its pleadings. First, the Government claims that the pleading would reveal correspondence with minors. Gov't Motion at 1. But the Government has redacted the names of the minors involved (including Petitioner's name), so there is no good basis for sealing. (Couns