Epstein Secrets

led a motion in it seeking to block the use of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Epstein's motion should be denied because there is no basis for a federal court to enter a new order blocking disclos

V-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON BACKGROUND A. Epstein's Lawsuit Against Edwards. On December 7, 2009, in an apparent (but unsuccessful) effort to intimidate Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alle

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma

led a motion in it seeking to block the use of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Bradley Edwards filed a response, and the Magistrate Judge denied Epstein's motion. The Magistrate Judge ruled that h

FLSD Docket 10/07/2010 Page 2 of 9 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARFtAiJOHNSON On December 7, 2009, in an apparent (but unsuccessful) effort to intimidate Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alleg

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma

led a motion in it seeking to block the use of certain incriminating correspondence in a separate state proceeding that he himself initiated against Jane Doe's attorney, Bradley J. Edwards. Epstein's motion should be denied because there is no basis for a federal court to enter a new order blocking disclos

V-80893-MARRAJJOHNSON BACKGROUND A. Epstein's Lawsuit Against Edwards. On December 7, 2009, in an apparent (but unsuccessful) effort to intimidate Jane Doe's attorney Bradley J. Edwards, defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a lawsuit in the 15°' Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida against Edwards alle

nt use of the correspondence in the Florida state case. See Epstein's Mot. for a Protective Order at 6 (citing Florida Rule of Crim. Pro. 3.172(i); Florida Evid. Code §§ 90.408 and 90.410). Of course, the judge presiding over the state case is perfectly capable of sorting out those objections in the state ma