Epstein Secrets

97 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06901 09/11/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Epstein-Cross Notice Of Depos Joint W/P Priv. 06902 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada RE: Jane Doe N

06799 08/19/2009 Anthony P Bradley Edwards Client Meeting Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06542-06548 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Pat Diaz Client Meeting Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06404-06408 09/10/2009 Bradley Edwards Pat Diaz NR Interview Attorney/Client priv

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in Jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02494.02515 09/20/2009 Bradley Edwards Pat Diaz Mark Epstein Info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 01080-01081 06/22/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe brother Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 01077 05/28/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Doe family member Attorney/Client p

06799 08/19/2009 Anthony P Bradley Edwards Client Meeting Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06542-06548 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Pat Diaz Client Meeting Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06404-06408 09/10/2009 Bradley Edwards Pat Diaz NR Interview Attorney/Client priv

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2O09 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03616-03618 10/01/2009 Pat Diaz Bradley Edwards Providing New Witnesses W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of ad

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan

heeler, Cara Holmes, Rob Buschel, Fisten, Steve Jaffe, and Nurik attend; b) Nurik emailed Edwards about the meeting; c) Edwards sent an email to Pat Diaz, another investigator on the Epstein case, regarding " new developments which require your expertise." - 8 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILL

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan

heeler, Cara Holmes, Rob Buschel, Fisten, Steve Jaffe, and Nurik attend; b) Nurik emailed Edwards about the meeting; c) Edwards sent an email to Pat Diaz, another investigator on the Epstein case, regarding " new developments which require your expertise." 24. On October 23, 2009, the following even