Epstein Secrets

2; and Count 2 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a federal offense; in violation of Title 18, United States Cod

The defendant agrees to plead guilty to a two-count Information which charges that the defendant intentionally harassed two other persons, that is, S.K. and N.M., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade those persons from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commissi

the defendant, while in an airplane over the high seas, did knowingly commit ripple assault on a person who was over the age of 16 years, that is, S.K.; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 113(aX5). 2. The defendant is aware that the sentence will be imposed by the Court after c

he defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection acco y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Stat . ode, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT 2 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the Uni

where, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, EFTA00771917 did knowingly commit a simple assault on a person who was over the age of 16 years, that is, S.K.; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 113(a)(5). D R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ARNEY S ATTORNEY A F 2 EFTA00771918

h County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, F JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did intentionally harass another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the T commission of

e defendant, A while in an airplane over the high seas, did knowingly commit a T ple assault on a person who was over the age of 16 years, that is, S.K.; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 113(aX5). 2. The defendant is aware that the sentence will be imposed by the Court after c

lty to the Information which charges the defendant as follows: Count 1 charges that the defendant intentionally harassed another person, F that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jo oe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a fed

defendant, while in an airplane over the high seas, did knowingly commit a simple assault on a person who was T over the age of 16 years, that is, S.K.; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Secti 113(a)(5). 2. The defendant is aware that the sentence will be imposed by the Court after co

each County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did intentionally harass another person, that is, Jane Doe #1, in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade Jane Doe #1 from reporting to a law enforcement officer of the United States the commission of a

t Information which charges the defendant as follows. Count I charges that the defendant attempted to intentionally harass another person, that is, S.K., in an attempt to delay, prevent, and dissuade S.K. from attending or testifying in an official proceeding, that is a federal grand jury appearance

he defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, did knowingly and intentionally violate the privacy protection accoi y 18 U.S.C. § 3509 to a child victim, that is, Jane Doe #1; in violation of Title 18, United Sta de, Sections 403 and 2. COUNT 2 In or around 2005, in the special territorial jurisdiction of the United

the defendant, while in an airplane over the high seas, did knowingly commit &Fie rigni ilt on a person who was over the age of 16 years, that is, S.K.; in violation of Tile 18, United States Code, Section 113(aX5)- 2. The defendant is aware that the sentence will be imposed by the Court after con

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in Jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

ery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02266 07/30/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley J. Edwards Epstein — Video Deposition of S.K. in NY Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence;

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2O09 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

ery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02266 07/30/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley J. Edwards Epstein — Video Deposition of S.K. in NY Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence;